Results for

General email informations

Sent at 2020-05-09 13:47:08
Received at 2020-05-09 13:47:08 UTC (0 seconds)
SMTP server IP
SMTP Reverse DNS (PTR)
SMTP client protocol Ok Email received via ESMTP using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (recommended)
Header FROM Simon <>
Subject My beautiful test

IP informations

Sending IP
ISP owner Example SAS
Usage type Data Center/Web Hosting/Transit
Country France
Senderscore 94 Good ! More infos about Senderscore
AbuseIPDB score 4 Good ! More infos about AbuseIPDB
Blacklisted on 1 impacting blacklists for
0spam DNSBL ok
Barracuda BRBL ok
Lashback UBL ok
Manitu NiX Spam ok
NoSolicitado BL listed
PSBL Passive Spam Block List ok
Return Path RPBL ok
SORBS Aggregate zone ok
SpamCop Block List ok
Spamhaus ZEN Combined Block List ok
SpamRATS! RATS-Dyna ok
SPFBL DNSBL - Bad Reputation ok
Truncate DNSBL ok
WPBL Block List ok
Zero Spam Project DNSBL ok

Authentication results

SPF test pass for using (sender SPF authorizedusing mechanism "")
DKIM test pass Signed by : using sha256 algorithm and a 1024 bits RSA key size
DMARC test pass
SPF test pass
SPF alignment pass
DKIM test pass
DKIM alignment fail
BIMI display No BIMI record found, you may be interested by that new technology to display your logo in front of your emails received. (More infos about BIMI)

DNS configurations

SPF validDNS lookups: 7 SPF record: "v=spf1 -all"
DMARC invalid does not indicate that it accepts DMARC reports about - Authorization record not found: IN TXT "v=DMARC1"
DMARC location: ""
DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=reject; sp=reject; pct=100; fo=1; adkim=r; aspf=r;,;,"
DKIM configuration is using a 1024bits RSA key, which starts to be considered weak (but not vulnerable, a 1024bits key is still safe), you should consider moving to a 2048bits key if technically possible:
DNSSEC DNSSEC protocol is not activated on, more infos on

Content analysis

Rspamd v2.7 some issues found5.79 / 15
0 RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD From address is listed in RWL - good reputation
0 R_SPF_ALLOW SPF verification allows sending
0.5 ZERO_FONT Zero sized font used
0 TO_DN_NONE None of the recipients have display names
1 URI_COUNT_ODD Odd number of URIs in multipart/alternative message
0 DKIM_TRACE DKIM trace symbol
0 RCVD_COUNT_ONE Message has one Received header
0.1 RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST Last hop did not use encrypted transports
0 MIME_TRACE ["0:+","1:+","2:~"]
0 ASN ["asn:200069, ipnet:\/21, country:FR"]
0 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM Message-ID RHS matches From domain
0 TAGGED_FROM SMTP from has plus tags
0 DWL_DNSWL_NONE Message has a valid dkim signature originated from domain listed at, no trust
0 ARC_NA ARC signature absent
0 R_DKIM_ALLOW DKIM verification succeed
0 FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM From address is different to the envelope
0 FROM_HAS_DN From header has a display name
2 HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1 Short html part (0..1K) with a link to an image
-0.1 MIME_GOOD Known content-type
-0.01 HAS_LIST_UNSUB Has List-Unsubscribe header
0 RCPT_COUNT_ONE One recipient
0.1 BAD_REP_POLICIES Contains valid policies but are also marked by fuzzy/bayes/surbl/rbl
0.7 MANY_INVISIBLE_PARTS Many parts are visually hidden
1.5 URIBL_GREY grey url
Spamassassin v3.4.2
Vanilla installation
good0.9 / 5
1.1 URIBL_GREY Contains an URL listed in the URIBL greylist [URIs:]
0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3 RBL: Good reputation (+3) [ listed in]
0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record
0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0 T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID BODY: Test for Invalidly Named or Formatted Colors in HTML
0 HTML_IMAGE_RATIO_06 BODY: HTML has a low ratio of text to image area
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain
-0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL Mailspike good senders
Domains 4 domain(s) extracted 4 issue(s) found
  • 2 domain(s) listed on URIBL
  • 0 domain(s) listed on Abusix
  • 0 other blacklists on domain(s)
  • 2 known tracking domain(s)
      • URIBL listing: ok
      • Abusix listing: ok
      • Other listing:
      • Tracking domain: no
      • URIBL listing: listed Greylisted, see
      • Abusix listing: ok
      • Other listing:
      • Tracking domain: yes
      • URIBL listing: listed Greylisted, see
      • Abusix listing: ok
      • Other listing:
      • Tracking domain: yes
      • URIBL listing: ok
      • Abusix listing: ok
      • Other listing:
      • Tracking domain: no
Tracking 13 unique external ressources 9 cookies or ETags

Etag and Cookies can be negatively seen, as user tracking inside a mail

    • etag: "e5a9b4b55e9bd9d7b38740522c07e693"
    • etag: "31d0e7e4fd11515f132671528637f91e"
    • etag: "b2db7d7d4b4cd1e6e39abfb45dc7de48"
    • etag: "6aa3db15bc21f9c1ca7387f2ffc86623"
    • etag: "9452c940983c6df34cef935c255f618c"
    • etag: "a9b631fd046404d08c9b01da7e181506"
    • etag: "0e1b4e011e0e82bbe538cdcd5c117f32"
    • etag: "a40a3ce386d2edb0eccbaf71fa05eab9"
    • etag: "f7c09bd91af6c9b11f1d082b186584fb"